VIKON ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the substantive addition made under Section 14A in the original assessment order was deleted by the Tribunal in a previous appeal, there was no basis for the AO or CIT(A) to enhance the disallowance in rectification proceedings. The impugned orders were set aside.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) initially disallowed Rs. 6,64,271 under Section 14A. Later, through rectification proceedings, the AO enhanced this disallowance to Rs. 20,45,835. The CIT(A) further enhanced the disallowance by Rs. 8,37,413.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be enhanced in rectification proceedings when the original disallowance has already been deleted by the Tribunal. The validity of enhancing a disallowance in Section 154 proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR
आदेश /O R D E R PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-24, New Delhi dated 27.10.2016 for AY 2010-11, challenging the enhancement u/s 14A of the I.T. Act in proceedings u/s 154 of the Act by AO as well as further by the Ld. CIT(A).
We have heard the Ld. Representatives of both the parties.
In this case, AO passed the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act dated 31.03.2013 for assessment year under appeal and made a I.T.A.No.21/Del/2017 disallowance of Rs. 6,64,271/- u/s 14A of the I.T. Act read with Rule 8D of the I.T. Rules. The AO later on passed the order u/s 154/143(3) of the I.T. Act dated 5.05.2014, whereby came to the finding that disallowance u/s 14A shall come to Rs. 20,45,835/- instead of Rs. 6,64,271/-. The mistake in the assessment order was rectified and disallowance was enhanced u/s 14A of the I.T. Act. The Ld. CIT(A) not only confirm the order of the AO in enhancing the addition u/s 14A of the I.T. Act in rectification proceedings u/s 154 of the I.T. Act, but also further enhanced the disallowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act in a sum of Rs. 8,37,413/- and appeal of assessee was dismissed with the above enhancement.
Ld. Counsel for assessee submitted that the assessee preferred appeal before ITAT against the original order in for assessment year under appeal i.e. 2010-11, challenging the disallowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act of Rs. 6,64,271/-. The appeal of assessee has been decided by the Tribunal vide order dated 31.12.2019 and addition has been deleted because no exempt income was claimed by assessee in assessment year under appeal. This ground of appeal of assessee was allowed. Order of the Tribunal is placed on record.
5. In view of the above facts, it is clear that when substantive addition made by the AO in the original assessment order u/s 14A of the I.T. Act has been deleted by the Tribunal, there is no reason for the AO or the Ld. CIT(A) to enhance the same disallowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act in the rectification proceedings u/s 154 of the I.T. Act. The order of the authorities below on the face of the order of the Tribunal dated 31.12.2019 (supra) clearly nullify the impugned orders.
6. In view of the above, we set aside the orders of the authorities below and cancel the enhancement made by the AO and the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 14A of the I.T. Act.
I.T.A.No.21/Del/2017
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10/03/2021
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026