RAJESH PURSHOTTAM SHAROFF,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PIRAMAL CHAMBER
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEEAssessment Year 2017-18
PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2017-18
is directed against the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the ld.
Commissioner of Income-tax [‘CIT(A)’], ADDL/JCIT(A) – 2, Noida.
2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee filed letter dated 10.01.2025 along with copy of Form 1 filed under Direct Tax
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and stated that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In light of the above and after considering that assessee has availed Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme 2024, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with Rajesh Purshottam Sharoff
A.Y. 2017-18
2
the liberty to reinstate the appeals if its application under Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not accepted.
3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17.01.2025. (ANIKESH BANERJEE) (AMARJIT SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Mumbai, Dated: 17.01.2025
Biswajit, Sr. P.S.
Copy to:
The Appellant: 2. The Respondent: 3. The CIT, 4. The DR
////
[
By Order