ACIT, CIRCLE- 52(1), NEW DELHI vs. N S SOFTWARE, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty. This was based on the fact that the quantum proceedings for the relevant assessment years were quashed by the Tribunal and subsequently upheld by the Delhi High Court, rendering the penalty unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The Department appealed the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 63,86,300/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was levied for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can survive when the underlying assessment order has been quashed by the Tribunal and upheld by the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Department against order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2008-09 wherein the Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the penalty amounting to Rs.63,86,300/- imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’).
2.0 At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submitted that the quantum proceedings in this case for the relevant Assessment Year was decided by Delhi Bench of the ITAT in favour of the assessee wherein the assessee’s appeals in 3585, 3586, 3587 & 3588/Del/2014 were allowed and the Department’s appeals in ITA Nos.3752 & 3753/Del/2014 were dismissed. The Ld. AR submitted that vide order dated 28.02.2018, the Tribunal had quashed the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer and, therefore, the very foundation for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act ceased to exist. The Ld. AR placed a copy of the order of the Tribunal on record. The Ld. AR further submitted that this order of the Tribunal was the subject matter of the appeal before the Hon’bel Delhi High Court and the Hon,ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 13.09.2017 dismissed the appeal of the Department. A copy of the order of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court was also placed on record.
3.0 Per contra, the Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative (DR) fairly accepted that the penalty did not survive in view of the order of the ITAT in the quantum proceedings.
4.0 Having heard both the parties, and after having gone through the order of the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings as aforementioned in 3585, 3586, 3587 & 3588/Del/2014 for Assessment Years 2005-06 to Assessment Years 2009-10, we agree with the contention of the Ld. AR that the quantum proceedings have been quashed by the Tribunal and, therefore, the consequential penalty has no feet to stand on. We also note that the above mentioned order of the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings have been upheld by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. Accordingly, we uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the penalty.
5.0 In the final result, the appeal of the Department stands dismissed. Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual hearing on 16th March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026