ACIT, CIRCLE- 52(1), NEW DELHI vs. N S SOFTWARE, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5714/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 March 2021AY 2008-094 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty. This was based on the fact that the quantum proceedings for the relevant assessment years were quashed by the Tribunal and subsequently upheld by the Delhi High Court, rendering the penalty unsustainable.

What were the facts?

The Department appealed the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 63,86,300/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was levied for the Assessment Year 2008-09.

What were the issues?

Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can survive when the underlying assessment order has been quashed by the Tribunal and upheld by the High Court.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 16.03.2021Pronounced: 16.03.2021

ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Department against order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2008-09 wherein the Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the penalty amounting to Rs.63,86,300/- imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’).

2.0 At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submitted that the quantum proceedings in this case for the relevant Assessment Year was decided by Delhi Bench of the ITAT in favour of the assessee wherein the assessee’s appeals in 3585, 3586, 3587 & 3588/Del/2014 were allowed and the Department’s appeals in ITA Nos.3752 & 3753/Del/2014 were dismissed. The Ld. AR submitted that vide order dated 28.02.2018, the Tribunal had quashed the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer and, therefore, the very foundation for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act ceased to exist. The Ld. AR placed a copy of the order of the Tribunal on record. The Ld. AR further submitted that this order of the Tribunal was the subject matter of the appeal before the Hon’bel Delhi High Court and the Hon,ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 13.09.2017 dismissed the appeal of the Department. A copy of the order of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court was also placed on record.

3.0 Per contra, the Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative (DR) fairly accepted that the penalty did not survive in view of the order of the ITAT in the quantum proceedings.

4.0 Having heard both the parties, and after having gone through the order of the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings as aforementioned in 3585, 3586, 3587 & 3588/Del/2014 for Assessment Years 2005-06 to Assessment Years 2009-10, we agree with the contention of the Ld. AR that the quantum proceedings have been quashed by the Tribunal and, therefore, the consequential penalty has no feet to stand on. We also note that the above mentioned order of the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings have been upheld by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. Accordingly, we uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the penalty.

5.0 In the final result, the appeal of the Department stands dismissed. Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual hearing on 16th March, 2021.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →