DINESH JITENDRA SHAH,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT -17, MUMBAI

By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 09th March 2021, passed by the learned CIT(A) in the matter of assessment u/s. 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2015-16.

When this appeal was called for hearing learned counsel for the assessee Shri Sanjay Parikh pointed out that in the assessment order passed, as a result of the impugned revision order no additions have made. It is thus submitted that no prejudice is caused to the assessee by the impugned revision order. In this view of the matter, according to the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal is infructuous. Learned Departmental Representative does not dispute the submissions so made by the learned counsel for the assessee and joins the learned counsel in praying that the appeal may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above position we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as infructuous. Ordered, accordingly.