ASSTT. CIT CENTRAL CIR-1(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S. PANDHE INFRACONS P. LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per Section 14 of the IBC, proceedings against a corporate debtor cannot continue once the matter is under the purview of a resolution professional. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The appeals arose from an assessment order passed under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. An interim resolution professional was appointed for the assessee under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings before the ITAT can continue against a corporate debtor undergoing insolvency resolution under the IBC. The applicability of Section 14 of the IBC to pending appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C‘ BENCH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
These cross appeals in 1812/Mum/2020 for A.Y.2011-12 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-47, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)- 47/10180/18-19 dated 18/03/2020 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.153A r.w.s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 30/12/2018 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. At the outset, we find that an interim resolution professional has been appointed under the provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) vide its order dated 06/09/2021 in the instance case. On earlier occasions, this Tribunal taking note of the same had served the notice on the interim resolution professional. Subsequently, Mr. Brijendra Kumar Mishra was appointed as resolution professional vide meeting of Company of Creditors (COC) dated 02/12/2021. As per Section 14 of the IBC 2016, there cannot be any continuation of proceedings before this Tribunal against the corporate debtor. Admittedly, the assessee herein is a corporate debtor. Hence, no proceedings shall remain pending with this Tribunal in respect of this assessee once the matter is under the purview of resolution professional. In view of the same, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee and also dismiss the appeal of the Revenue, with a liberty given to both the parties to revive these appeals, if they so desire, after the completion of insolvency resolution process. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 25/04/2022 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026