M/S. PNB GILTS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT- VII, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the appeal had become infructuous due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax. During the hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal that they had opted to settle the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal was valid and whether the order passed under Section 263 was time-barred. However, the appeal was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme before these issues were adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Income Tax Department dated 23/02/2015 for Assessment Year 2006-07. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:
“1. The order of Learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 is time barred and invalid and the same could have been passed upto 31-03-2011 since the order under section 143(3) was passed on 17-12-2008. 2. Without prejudice to Ground No. 1, the mistake in the order was in the order passed under Section 143(3) on 17-12-2008. There is no mistake in the order passed under section 147/143(3) dated 21-12-2012 ITA No.- 2964/Del/2015. M/s PNB GILTS LTD. and Explanation 2 added to section 263 by Finance Act, 2015 is not applicable.
Without prejudice to Ground No. 1 and Ground No. 2, the direction of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax to Assessing Officer to add back diminution in value of closing stock while computing Book Profits under Section 115JB is bad in law since closing stock has to be valued at cost or market value whichever is less, which is the established principle of valuation of closing stock.
The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, vary, modify or otherwise amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally disposed of.”
(B) At the time of hearing, the learned Authorized Representative (“Ld. AR”, for short) for the Assessee informed us that the assessee has opted to settle the aforementioned appeal under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the assessee has already filed the relevant forms. She drew our attention to letter dated 8th April, 2021 from assessee’s side in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) giving intimation of the same. It was also brought to our attention that Form-5, dated 16/02/2021 has been issued by the Designated Authority under aforesaid VSVS. In view of this, the learned AR as well as the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative) [“Ld. CIT(DR), for short] submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become infructuous on account of aforesaid VSVS, and this appeal may be treated as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.
ITA No.- 2964/Del/2015. M/s PNB GILTS LTD. (B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal, in accordance with law.
(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.
This order was already pronounced orally on 8th April, 2021 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 08/04/21.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026