M/S. PNB GILTS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT- VII, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2964/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 April 2021AY 2006-074 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal noted that the appeal had become infructuous due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax. During the hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal that they had opted to settle the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal was valid and whether the order passed under Section 263 was time-barred. However, the appeal was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme before these issues were adjudicated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Income Tax Department dated 23/02/2015 for Assessment Year 2006-07. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:

“1. The order of Learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 is time barred and invalid and the same could have been passed upto 31-03-2011 since the order under section 143(3) was passed on 17-12-2008. 2. Without prejudice to Ground No. 1, the mistake in the order was in the order passed under Section 143(3) on 17-12-2008. There is no mistake in the order passed under section 147/143(3) dated 21-12-2012 ITA No.- 2964/Del/2015. M/s PNB GILTS LTD. and Explanation 2 added to section 263 by Finance Act, 2015 is not applicable.

3.

Without prejudice to Ground No. 1 and Ground No. 2, the direction of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax to Assessing Officer to add back diminution in value of closing stock while computing Book Profits under Section 115JB is bad in law since closing stock has to be valued at cost or market value whichever is less, which is the established principle of valuation of closing stock.

4.

The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, vary, modify or otherwise amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally disposed of.”

(B) At the time of hearing, the learned Authorized Representative (“Ld. AR”, for short) for the Assessee informed us that the assessee has opted to settle the aforementioned appeal under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the assessee has already filed the relevant forms. She drew our attention to letter dated 8th April, 2021 from assessee’s side in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) giving intimation of the same. It was also brought to our attention that Form-5, dated 16/02/2021 has been issued by the Designated Authority under aforesaid VSVS. In view of this, the learned AR as well as the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative) [“Ld. CIT(DR), for short] submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become infructuous on account of aforesaid VSVS, and this appeal may be treated as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.

ITA No.- 2964/Del/2015. M/s PNB GILTS LTD. (B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal, in accordance with law.

(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.

This order was already pronounced orally on 8th April, 2021 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 08/04/21.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →