ARCHANA SINGH MANN SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 24 (1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessee to approach for restoration if the matter is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals challenging the CIT(A)'s order dismissing their appeals against assessment orders passed under Section 153C read with Section 153A of the Act. The assessee later requested withdrawal of these appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
By way of the present appeals the Appellant/Assessee has challenged the order, dated 29.01.2019, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-36, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] in appeals [CIT(A)-36/IT- & 2059/Mum/2019 Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2013-14 438/ACIT-24(1)/2016-17 & CIT(A)-36/IT-439/ACIT-24(1)/2016-17] for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2013-14, respectively.
The CIT(A) has by way of the common order, dated 29.01.2019, impugned herein, dismissed the appeals filed by the Assessee against the assessment orders for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2013-14 passed under Section 153C read with section 153A of the Act. Being aggrieved, the Assessee has filed the present appeals challenging the aforesaid order of CIT(A).
The Assessee has, vide letter dated 14.02.2022, made a request for withdrawal of the present appeals having opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The Assessee has placed on record certificate issued by the designated authority in Form 3 for the Assessment Year 2010-11 (Acknowledgement No. 832541000171220) and for Assessment Year 2013-14 (Acknowledgment No. 231632520290121). The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the aforesaid request of the assessee.
In view of the above, the present appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the Assessee to approach this Tribunal for the restoration of the present appeals in the event of matter not being resolved under Vivad Se Vishawas Scheme, 2020.
In the result, subject to aforesaid, the appeals filed by the Assessee 5. are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 28.04.2022.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Surveillance System, Sambalpur vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST Odisha , CT And GST Commissionerate , Cuttack OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026