FARHAZ ASIF LAKHANI,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX 21(1)(5), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Department did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently sought to withdraw the appeal via a letter.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal should be granted.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI BASKARAN BR & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
M/s. Farhas Asif Lakhani, Income Tax Officer A-1, 1st Floor, 21(1)(5), Allaba Building, Room No.120, 1st Floor, Motilal Road, Vs. Agripada, Piramal Chambers, Mumbai – 400 011 Lalbaug, PAN: ACAPL2418H Parel, Mumbai - 400012 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Ashish Pophare, D.R. Date of Hearing : 11 . 05 . 2022 Date of Pronouncement : 11 . 05 . 2022 O R D E R Per : Kuldip Singh, Judicial Member: Vide letter dated 10TH May, 2022 and for the reasons stated therein, the assessee seeks to withdraw the present appeal. The department has no objection. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 11.05.2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026