Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Om Prakash Kant
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH MUMBAI Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member & Shri Om Prakash Kant, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2009-10 Siddhivinayak Associates……………….……..….…..………………….……Appellant 138, Mahavir Building, Bhandarkar Road, Matunga, Mumbai-400019. [PAN: AACFS2982D] vs. ACIT-17(1), Mumbai.…..…………………….…………...……………..…..Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri V. K. Chaturvedi appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : May 11, 2022 Date of pronouncing the order : May 11, 2022 ORDER Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 05.02.2013 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The assessee vide letter dated 09.03.2022 has submitted that it has availed the benefit of the scheme under “Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020” and has paid due taxes. It may, therefore, be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. The appeal of the assessee is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Mumbai, the 11th May, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- [Om Prakash Kant] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 09.05.2022. RS
Assessment Year: 2009-10 Siddhivinayak Associates