MANITOWOC CRANE GROUP ASIA PTE LTD.,PUNE vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn. However, it granted the assessee liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT. This withdrawal was requested because the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) scheme and had filed the necessary declarations and undertakings.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI & SH. K. NARASIMHA CHARY
ORDER
PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(2)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Act pursuant to the direction of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) – 2, New Delhi order dated 07.12.2016 for Assessment Year 2012- 13.
2 2. Before us, assessee has vide email dated 11th March, 2021 seeks withdrawal of appeal as it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form-1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and department had issued Form- 3. The assessee therefore seeks to withdraw the appeal, to which the Revenue has no objection.
After considering the request made by the assessee, we dismiss the appeal of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026