SHRI. SHANKARLAL TULASIRAM GILADA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 953/BANG/2016Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 February 2022AY 2011-122 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal took note of the assessee's letter seeking to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2011-12. The assessee's counsel withdrew from the case. Subsequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B. R. BASKARAN

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 08.02.2022Pronounced: 08.02.2022

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shri. Shankarlal Tulasiram Gilada, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, C/o. M/s. Gita Refractories Pvt. Ltd., Ward – 11(2), #2, 40 Feet Road, Off Kalpana Chawla Bengaluru. Road, 5th Main, 4th Cross, Sanjaynagar, Bengaluru – 560 094. PAN : AHWPS 6995 D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Sheetal, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 08.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 08.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President : V. Vasudevan, Vice President

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order dated 17.03.2016 of CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2011-12. When this appeal was called for hearing, learned Counsel for the assessee Smt. Sheetal Borkar, Advocate, filed a memo informing the Bench that she has withdrawn her vakalath in the above matter and that notice may be sent directly to the assessee. She also informed the Bench that she has duly intimated the assessee about her withdrawing from the brief.

3. When the case was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. We, however, find that the assessee has filed the letter dated 21.10.2021 in which he has sought leave of this Tribunal to withdraw the appeal as the dispute in the appeal has been settled by the assessee under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. Taking note of the letter of the assessee which is also accompanied by Form No.1 and Form No.3 filed under the Vivas Se Vishwas Act, 2020, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.

3.

In the result, appeal by the assessee is dismissed.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →