No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES ”A”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 770/JP/2018
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES ”A”, JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 770/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2013-14 cuke Shri Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi, ITO, Vs. Prop.- Jai Shiv Shankar Tirtha Yatra Ward- Karauli. Company, Vardhman Nagar, Hindaun City, Karauli. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABSPC 5329 D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Shri S.L. Poddar & Ms. Isha Kanoongo (Adv) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri J.C. Kulhari (JCIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 16/10/2018 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 10/12/2018 vkns'k@ ORDER
PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated
16/03/2018 of ld. CIT(A), Kota for the A.Y. 2013-14. The assessee has
raised following grounds of appeal: “1. That under the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming of Rs. 49,27,778/- on account of Rail Fair Expenses supported by the respective tickets and receipts and most of the payments were made through cross account payee cheques.
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 2 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
That under the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld CIT(A) has erred in confirming the following addition made by the Assessing Officer by disallowing following expenses:- Particulars Amount Advertisement expenses 125383 Bus hire charges 664044 Food and refreshment expenses 799548 Tour manager and staff salary 329600 Sundry expenses 306012 Postage and courier expenses 179996 Printing and stationery 758909 Total 3163492 3. The assessee craves your indulgence to add amend or alter all or any grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.”
Ground No. 1 of the appeal is regarding disallowance of rail fair
expenses. The assessee is an individual and proprietor of M/s Jai Shiv
Shankar Tirtha Yatra Company. The assessee is engaged in the business
of Travelling agency business organizing the tirth yatra (religious trips)
specially for old age people and saints. The assessee filed his return of
income on 30/09/2013 declaring total income of Rs. 8,22,480/-. During
the year under consideration, the assessee has claimed train ticket
expenses of Rs. 2,84,27,813/-. The Assessing Officer asked the assessee
to produce the supporting evident in respect of claim of rail fair
expenditure. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has
produced the evidence to the extent of Rs. 2,35,000,35/- and
consequently the Assessing Officer has disallowed the balance amount
of Rs. 49,27,778/- for want of supporting evidence.
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 3 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer
before the ld. CIT(A) and submitted written submissions. The ld. CIT(A)
has confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer on the ground that
the Assessing Officer has fairly allowed more than 80% of the claim for
which proper evidences were filed.
Before us, the ld AR of the assessee has submitted that the books
of account of the assessee are audited U/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (in short the Act) where the assessee has shown the total receipt
of Rs. 7,10,86,203/- on which net profit of Rs. 10.6 lacs were declared,
which is more in comparison to the last years. He has further submitted
that the turnover of the assessee has increased during the year from Rs.
4.61 crores to Rs. 7.10 crores. The net profit rate for the earlier year
was 1.10% whereas the net profit for the year under consideration is
1.50%, therefore, the assessee has declared better results for the year
under consideration on substantially higher turnover and hence there is
no reason for doubting the claim of expenditure. The ld AR has further
contended that the expenditure claimed by the assessee on account of
rail fair is only the rail fair and food expenses during the trips of pilgrims
which are more than 80% of the total expenditure. He has referred the
copy of ledger account of rail fair expenditure at page Nos. 31 to 42 of
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 4 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
the paper book and submitted that all the payments were made to the
railways which can be verified independently from the railways. The
most of the payments were made through cross account payee cheques
duly reflected in the bank account of the assessee as well as recorded in
the books of account of the assessee. The cash payment was made only
where it was urgently needed for booking the reservation on urgent
basis. The railway has issued the cash receipts in such cases which were
duly produced before the Assessing Officer. The ld AR has referred to
the receipts issued by the railways at page Nos. 31 to 154 of the paper
book and submitted that all these documents were produced before the
Assessing Officer. However, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the
claim without verification of the receipts issued by the railways. The
Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings, conducted a test
check of account with all receipts and vouchers produced by the
assessee, however, in the assessment order, the Assessing Officer has
made the disallowance of Rs. 49,27,778/- for want of supporting
evidence and details which is contrary to the evidence produced by the
assessee. The ld. AR has contended that the assessee produced all the
details in support of the claim and therefore, there is no scope of not
production of any part of the bills of details. The assessee produced
complete books of account alongwith the ledgers as well as the bills and
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 5 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
receipts issued by the railways. Though the complete record was
available on the assessment record, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the
disallowance without considering the submissions or giving opportunity
to the assessee to make proper representation. Hence, the ld AR has
submitted that the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to produce the
books of account and relevant details and records which were produced
by the assessee and thereafter no show cause notice was given by the
Assessing Officer to make the disallowance of Rs. 49,27,778/-.
On the other hand, the ld DR has submitted that the assessee has
not produced any new material or record in support of the claim despite
sufficient opportunities were given by the Assessing Officer as well as
the ld. CIT(A). Only at the fag-end of the assessment, the assessee filed
the details sought by the Assessing Officer and therefore, the Assessing
Officer has passed the assessment order which was time barring. The
Assessing Officer has given the reasons for disallowance as the
supporting evidence and details were not furnished by the assessee. He
has relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
We have considered the rival submissions as well as the relevant
material on record. There is no dispute that the assessee is undertaking
tour trips of the pilgrims at various placed through Indian Railways as
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 6 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
well as road transports. The business activity of the assessee involved
the expenditure during the journey apart from railway fair, bus fair and
other sundry expenditure. The assessee claimed train ticket expenditure
of Rs. 2,84,27,813/- against the turnover of Rs. 7,10,86,203/-. There is
no dispute that that the turnover of the assessee is significantly higher
in comparison to the preceding year of Rs. 4.61 crores. Despite the
substantial increase in the turnover, the assessee’s G.P. and N.P. rte
declared for the year under consideration is much better than the
preceding years. The Assessing Officer has made disallowance of Rs.
49,27,778/- out of the total claim of Rs. 2,84,27,813/- on the ground
that the assessee has not filed the relevant details and supporting
evidence. It is pertinent to note that the train ticket expenditure claimed
by the assessee can be verified from the details of the tickets and
journey undertaken by the assessee and number of pilgrims taken to the
trips. The train ticket expenditure has a direct nexus with the
correspondence receipt as it can be compared from number of
passengers undertaken the journey for pilgrims trips. The Assessing
Officer has not pointed out or made any allegation about the inflated
expenditure or excess expenditure claimed by the assessee in
comparison to the preceding year in terms of the percentage of the
number of the pilgrims or the total turnover. The assessee has filed
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 7 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
complete details of expenditure alongwith supporting evidence which is
nothing but the receipts issued by the railways. Further the assessee
has also filed the receipt issued by the Indian Railway Catering (IRCTC)
giving all details of payments through cheques or in some cases though
cash. Even otherwise the Assessing Officer has not doubted 80% of the
claim of railway ticket expenditure. Once the assessee produced the
entire details alongwith ledger account or audited books of account
giving the details of the total number of passengers taken to the tips
then the corresponding ticket expenditure cannot be disallowed. The
ticket expenditure has a direct nexus with the corresponding receipts
and therefore, once the assessee has shown the receipt for all he trips
undertaken through railways then the ticket expenditure is essential
expenditure which can be verified from the record. We note that the
assessee has produced about more than 120 pages of documents
comprising of receipts issued by the railways and each receipt is in most
of the cases is for the entire lot of passengers travelling in a trip.
Therefore, when the assessee has filed the supporting evidence and the
Assessing Officer has not given any specific show cause notice for
making the disallowance of Rs. 49,27,778/- out of the total claim then
said disallowance at the back of the assessee and further the entire
record was available with the A.O., is not justified. Accordingly, we
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 8 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
delete the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer which is made in
a summary manner without proper verification of the record.
Ground No. 2 of the appeal is regarding the ad hoc disallowance
of various expenditure. The Assessing Officer has made disallowance of
5% to 50% of the various expenditure for want of supporting bills and
vouchers. The Assessing Officer has given the reasons that since the
assessee has not produced the complete bills and vouchers and some of
the vouchers are self made, therefore, 5% to 50% respectively of these
expenditure were disallowed by the Assessing Officer.
The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer
before the ld. CIT(A) but could not succeed.
Before us, the ld AR of the assessee has submitted that the
assessee produced books of account, ledger accounts as well as all
supporting bills and vouchers in respect of the various expenditure,
however, the Assessing Officer has made ad hoc disallowances without
proper examination of the record produced by the assessee. He has
referred the details of the expenditure and submitted that the payment
of expenditure was made after deduction of TDS. Further all the
expenditures were duly recorded in the books of account as well as in
the ledger account and also supported by the bills and vouchers,
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 9 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
therefore, an ad hoc disallowance is not permissible. In support of his
contention, he has relied upon the decision of Kolkata Benches of the
Tribunal in the case of DCIT Vs. M/s Lexicon Auto Ltd. in ITA No.
1354/Kol/2016 order dated 19/02/2018 and submitted that the Tribunal
has held that the disallowance on account of ad hoc basis is not
permissible under the provisions of the Act. If the Assessing Officer is
not satisfied with the claim and explanation of the assessee then he has
to make the disallowance after making specific reference of such
documents/vouchers and particular expenditure. The Assessing Officer
cannot just make the disallowance on ad hoc basis without pointing out
any defect or error in the explanation and record submitted by the
assessee. The ld AR has then relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Gujarat
High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Vallabh Glas Works Ltd. (2014) 220
Taxman 129 (Guj). Hence, he has contended that when the majority of
the payment was made through cheque and only a friction of the
amount was paid in cash due to the necessity of the circumstances
during the journey, the same cannot be disallowed on ad hoc basis.
On the other hand, the ld. DR has submitted that the Assessing
Officer has given the reasons for disallowance being the complete
details as well as the supporting evidence was not filed by the assessee
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 10 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
and even some of the vouchers were self made vouchers which were
not verifiable. He has relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant
material on record. The assessee has claimed various expenses as
under:
Particulars Amount Advertisement expenses 25,07,666/- Bus hire charges 1,32,80,883/- Food and refreshment expenses 1,59,90,959/- Tour manager and staff salary expenses 32,96,000/- Sundry expenses 30,60,222/- Postage and courier expenses 8,99,990/- Printing and stationery expenses 15,17,818/- The Assessing Officer made the disallowance equivalent to 5% to 50%
of these expenditure, total amounting to Rs. 31,63,492/-. The details of
the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer are as under:
Particulars Amount Advertisement expenses 125383 Bus hire charges 664044 Food and refreshment expenses 799548 Tour manager and staff salary 329600 Sundry expenses 306012 Postage and courier expenses 179996 Printing and stationery 758909 Total 3163492 11.1 As regards the disallowance of advertising expenses of Rs.
1,25,383/-, the Assessing Officer has made the disallowance of 5% of
the total expenditure of Rs. 25,07,666/-. It is pertinent to note that the
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 11 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
total advertising expenses are 3.5% of the total receipts which were
paid to the news paper and advertisement agencies. The entire payment
has been made through account payee cheques except Rs.6,778/-. Thus
once the payment was made to the news paper and advertisement
agencies through cheques and after deduction of TDS then the claim of
the assessee cannot be doubted. Even if the Assessing Officer was not
satisfied with the claim then the same could have been verified from the
recipients but no such exercise has been done by the Assessing Officer
and the Assessing Officer has made ad hoc disallowance of 5% of the
total expenses. We further note that the Assessing Officer has not
doubted the genuineness of the expenditure as it was not found to be
excessive and further when almost the entire payment was made
through banking channels and full details as per the ledge accounts
were produced by the assessee with supporting bills number and name
of the recipient in the ledger account then the said ad hoc disallowance
is uncalled for. Accordingly in the facts and circumstances of the case
when the assessee has paid the entire amount except a negligible
amount of Rs. 6,778/- through cheque and after deduction of TDS and
particulars of the parties alongwith bill number and dates were also
given in the ledger account then the ad hoc disallowance is not
permissible. Hence, the same is deleted.
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 12 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
11.2 Disallowance of bus hire charges:- Out of the total
expenditure of Rs. 1,32,80,883/-, the Assessing Officer has made the ad
hoc disallowance of 5% amounting to Rs. 6,64,044/-. The sole ground
of the Assessing Officer is that the complete bills and vouchers were not
produced by the assessee. We note that the assessee has filed the
vouchers details and supporting documents which are placed at page
No. 164 to 213 of the paper book. Further when the payments are made
to the bus operators and details of the bus operators are given and
further when these expenditures are also explained trip wise then in
absence of any allegation about the excess claim or inflated claim of
expenditure, ad hoc disallowance made by the Assessing Officer is not
permissible. The assessee produced audited accounts with regard to the
expenditure and also given the complete details of expenditure which is
supported by the bills and vouchers then even if some vouchers are
handmade, the same cannot be a reason when the particulars in the
vouchers are proper and complete. We further note that the assessee
has declared net profit of 1.5% which is highest in comparison to the
preceding 2 years for the A.Y. 2012-13 and 2011-12 at 1.1% and .85%.
Considering all these details particularly in view of the fact that the
turnover of the assessee has increased substantially from 4.61 crores to
7.10 crores, the claim of expenditure cannot be doubted as it
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 13 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
commensurates with the corresponding receipts. Hence, the ad hoc
disallowance made by the Assessing Officer is deleted.
11.3 Disallowance of Food and Refreshment expenses:- The
Assessing Officer has made disallowance of 5% on the ground that the
bills and vouchers produced by the assessee were handmade and were
rejected by the Assessing Officer. It is not disputed by the Assessing
Officer that the expenditure claimed by the assessee was incurred in
connection with the business activity of the assessee as food and
refreshment are inseparable part of the tour trips undertaken by the
assessee. Therefore, once no allegation of excess claim or bogus claim,
having considering the number of pilgrims taken to the tour during the
year under consideration and number of days of journey, the ad hoc
disallowance is not justified. The Assessing Officer even otherwise not
doubted the allowability of claim of expenditure lend out wholly and
exclusively for the business purpose then if the claim of the assessee is
not excessive and has a direct nexus with the number of passengers and
duration of the tour trips then an ad hoc disallowance is uncalled for and
the same is deleted.
11.4 Disallowance of Tour management and staff salary @
10%:- The sole ground of ad hoc disallowance on the ground that the
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 14 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
some of the bills and vouchers were self made and no confirmation were
produced by the assessee. It is pertinent to note that the assessee has
claimed payment of the salary to the staff which is necessary for the
activity of Tour & Travels having a turnover of more than Rs. 7.00
crores. Therefore having peculiar nature of the business activity of the
assessee where without the service of the management and other staff,
the same is not possible then in absence of a bogus or excessive claim,
an ad hoc disallowance made by the Assessing Officer is not justified
and the same is deleted. Even otherwise in the case, the Assessing
Officer had doubted any particular payment of salary then he could have
undertaken a test check examination of the claim instead of resorting to
the ad hoc disallowance.
11.5 Disallowance of sundry expenses:- The Assessing Officer has
made disallowance of 10% of the sundry expenses on the ground that
the bills and vouchers produced by the assessee were self made. The ld
AR has pointed out that the expenditure claimed by the assessee is
regarding wages for cooking staff, accommodation expenses, helper and
attendant expenses, video and photograph expenses are incurred at the
spot and in connection with business activity of the assessee of taking
the pilgrims on tour. Therefore, the expenditure incurred at the spot of
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 15 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
the tour and in between is incurred in cash as the situation and nature
of the expenditure demands so. These expenditures are duly recorded in
the books and also supported by bills and vouchers though some of the
bills and vouchers are self made in respect of the wages paid to the
cooking staff. We find that once the expenditure is not excessive in
comparison to the earlier years to the total receipt of the year under
consideration then an ad hoc disallowance is not permissible. There is
no dispute that the expenditure claimed by the assessee is of such a
nature that these expenditures cannot be made other than cash at the
distant and remote places where these expenditures were incurred.
Accordingly having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case
when there is no allegation about the excessive or non-genuineness of
the expenditure, the ad hoc disallowance of 10% is deleted.
11.6 Disallowance of postage and courier expenses:- The
assessee has claimed postage and courier expenditure of Rs. 8,99,990/-.
The Assessing Officer disallowed 20% of the said expenditure on the
ground that all bills and vouchers produced were self made. We find
that the assessee has produced only details of the expenditure which is
mostly on account of postage stamp purchased by the assessee and
speed post and courier expenses. As far as the purchase of postage
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 16 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO
stamp is concerned, since there is no receipt issued by the post office,
therefore, except self made vouchers no other supporting evidence can
be produced. However, as regards the registry/speed post as well as
courier expenses, there are proper receipts and bills issued by the postal
authorities as well as courier agencies. The assessee has not produced
those receipts, therefore, we find that the assessee has failed to
discharge his onus to prove that the entire expenditure has been
incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business to the extent
of registry and speed post as well as courier expenditure. Hence, the
disallowance made by the Assessing Officer at 20% of the total
expenditure is found to be excessive which is restricted to 10% of the
total claim.
11.7 Disallowance of printing and stationary expenses:- The
Assessing Officer has made a disallowance of 50% of the expenditure
claimed by the assessee on the ground that all the bills and vouchers
were self made. We find that in support of the claim of the printing and
stationery expenditure of Rs. 15,17,818/-, the assessee has given only
details of the persons and bill numbers. Though, the assessee given
details of the persons and bill numbers, however, the bills were not
produced by the assessee in support of his claim. Therefore, the details
ITA 770/JP/2018_ 17 Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs ITO given by the assessee remained unverified for want of the relevant bills.
The assessee though claimed to have produced bills and vouchers
however, what is produced on the record is only details and not the bills
and vouchers. Accordingly, in view of the facts and circumstances of the
case, we find that 50% of the disallowance made by the Assessing
Officer is excessive and therefore, the same is restricted to 20% of the
total expenses.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th December, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼fot; iky jko½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (VIJAY PAL RAO) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 10th December, 2018 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Ramesh Chand Chaturvedi, Karauli. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO, Ward- Karauli. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 770/JP/2018) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत