Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 902/JP/2018
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 12th March,
2018 of ld. CIT (A), Kota for the assessment year 2009-10. None has appeared on
behalf of the assessee despite the fact that on the last date of hearing i.e.
11.10.2018 the assessee sought adjournment and the hearing was adjourned for
today i.e. 11.12.2018. The notice of hearing was sent to the assessee on
12.10.2018. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the assessee is not interested in
prosecution of the present appeal. In these circumstances, following the decision of
Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD
320 and also on the judgment of the Hon’ble M.P. High Court in the case of Estate of
Late Tukhoji Rao Holkar vs. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), we dismiss the appeal
of the assessee for want of prosecution.
2 ITA No. 902/JP/2018 Shri Iqbal Mohd., Bundi.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 11/12/2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (foØe flag ;kno) (fot; iky jkWo ½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV ) (VIJAY PAL RAO) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Jaipur Dated:- 11/12/2018. Das/
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
The Appellant- Shri Iqbal Mohd., Bundi. 2. The Respondent – The ITO Bundi. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 902/JP/2018) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत
3 ITA No. 902/JP/2018 Shri Iqbal Mohd., Bundi.