SHRI NAVTELJ KUMAR SHANGARI,JAMSHEDPUR vs. PR COMM,I.T, JAMSHEDPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal and the Departmental Representative raised no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2012-13 against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's counsel stated that they no longer wished to press the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal filed against the order passed under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
PER BENCH:- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur’s order dated 23.03.2017 involving proceedings u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’.
Learned counsel states at assessee’s behest that he no more wishes to press the instant appeal. Learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection.
ITA No.82/Ran/2017 A.Y. 2012-13
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court 11/01/2019 (लेखा सद य) ("या#यक सद य) (Dr. A.L. Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026