SHRI ARUN AGRWAL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAMSHEDPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lower authorities erred in imposing the penalty as it was not based on any specified material prescribed in Section 271AAB Explanation clause (c). Penalty provisions are to be strictly interpreted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenges a penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14. The penalty was based on the assessee's disclosure during a search operation.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty under Section 271AAB was correctly imposed without reference to specified material as required by the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
PER BENCH:- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3 Patna’s order dated 31.07.2017 passed in case No.143/CIT(A)-3/PAT/15-16 involving proceedings u/s 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused
The assessee’s three substantive grounds raised in the instant appeal challenges both the lower authorities’ action imposing sec 271AAB penalty of Rs.11,26,500/-. We sought to know during the course of hearing as to whether the impugned penalty is based on any specified material prescribed in u/s 271AAB Explanation clause (c) of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271AAB
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1564/KOL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse Shoe… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1559/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1558/KOL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1557/KOL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1556/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026