MISSION GREEN,AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the matter should be remitted back to the CIT(Exemptions) to decide the issue in accordance with law, considering the principle of natural justice. The CIT(Exemptions) was directed to examine the documents already submitted and grant registration under Section 12AA and then proceed with the application under Section 80G.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) was rejected ex-parte by the CIT(Exemptions). The grounds for rejection were the lack of registration under Section 12AA and non-submission of relevant documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the application ex-parte without providing an opportunity to the assessee to present its case and documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB”, BENCH AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, JM & DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A.L. Saini:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2019-20, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) dated 24.05.2019.
At the outset itself, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that ld. CIT(E) has passed an ex-parte order and rejected assessee’s application u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Act mainly on two grounds that assessee Trust has not been granted registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) and the assessee has not submitted the relevant documents and details during the proceedings. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted before us written submission and requested the Bench that one more opportunity should be given to the assessee to plead his case before the ld.
ITA No.399/ASR/2019 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Mission Green CIT(E). On the other hand, the ld. DR did not have any objection if the matter is remitted back to the file of the ld. CIT(E).
We have heard ld. DR for the Revenue and perused the material available on record. We note that the CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee on two grounds namely: the assessee Trust is not registered u/s 12AA of the Act or 10(23) of the Act, and the assessee did not submit the required documents and evidences during the proceedings before the ld. CIT(E). In the written submissions, the ld. Counsel stated that he has submitted the required documents for registration u/s 12AA as well as for registration u/s 80G of the Act, however, ld. CIT(E) has ignored the same. Keeping in mind the principle of natural justice and fair play we are of the view that this matter should be remitted back to the file of the ld CIT(E) to decide the issue in accordance with law. We note that assessee has made substantial compliance and already submitted required documents and explanation for registration u/s12AA and registration u/s 80G of the Act. Therefore, we direct the ld. CIT(E) to examine the documents/explanations already submitted before him and if required, he may ask further documents/explanation from the assessee and thereafter grant the registration u/s 12AA and after that u/s 80G of the Act in accordance to law; within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. The assessee is also directed to submit the required documents/explanation before ld. CIT(E) and any default on the part of the assessee would be deemed as vacation of our instant remand order. Therefore, we direct the ld. CIT(E) that if the assessee has been granted registration u/s 12AA of the Act then he may proceed the request of the assessee’s application u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Act.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Court on 25.11.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (N.K. CHOUDHRY) (A.L.SAINI) "या�यकसद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखासद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AmritsarAmritsar *दनांक/ Date: 25/11/2019 (BCG, PS) Page | 2
ITA No.399/ASR/2019 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Mission Green
Copy of the order forwarded to:
Mission Green, C/o. B.D. Bansal & Co., B-641, Ranjit Avaenue, Near A-Block, Gurudwara, Amritsar, Punjab-143 001. 2. CIT (Exemptions), Income Tax Office Himalaya Marg, Sector 17-E, Chandigarh- 160 017. 3. C.I.T(A). 4. C.I.T.- concerned. 5. The Sr. DR, I.T.A.T., Amritsar.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Smt. Amna Baghel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Harshita Seeds vs. Idbi BankMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- Rajdeep vs. Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026