KODAK INDIA PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT 14 (2)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objections to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the final assessment order for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the matter under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 5(1),Section 5(2),Section 6
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, K BENCH, MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "K" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-16) Kodak India Private Limited, First Floor, Dani Corp Park, 158 Dani Compound, Vidyanagri Marg, Santacruz (East), Mumbai - 400098 [PAN: AAACK2172] ……………… Appellant Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 14(2)(1), Room No. 432, 4th Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, Maharishi Karve Road, ……..………. Respondent Mumbai - 400020 Appearances For the Appellant/Assessee : Shri Raunak For the Respondent/Department : Shri Yogesh Kamat Date of conclusion of hearing : 16.03.2022 Date of pronouncement of order : 13.06.2022
O R D E R Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: By way of the present appeal the Appellant/Assessee has 1. challenged the final assessment order, dated 29.10.2019, passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] for the Assessment Year 2015-16.
The Appellant has made a request for withdrawal of the appeal 2. having opted to settle the matter under the provisions of Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DTVSV Act’). The Assessee has placed on record a certificate in Form 3 issued under Section 5(1) of the DTVSV Act [Acknowledgement No. 222807360210121] and order of full and final settlement of tax arrears under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the DTVSV Act [Acknowledgement No. 269275050200221]. The learned Departmental Representative does not have any objections to the aforesaid request of the Appellant.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as 3. withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 13.06.2022.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026