WINTEX MILLS PVT.LTD.,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(4), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of municipal tax and the portion of the cooperative society payment pertaining to earlier years, stating that expenses crystallized in earlier years cannot be allowed in the current year merely by passing a journal entry or a resolution. Interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was also confirmed as mandatory.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deductions for municipal tax and a payment to a cooperative society. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims as they pertained to earlier assessment years, and the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting. The CIT(A) upheld these disallowances, except for a portion of the cooperative society payment made during the year.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses pertaining to earlier assessment years, even if paid in the current year, are allowable as deductions when the assessee follows the mercantile system of accounting. Whether interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D is mandatory.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 43B,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH & SHRI O.P.MEENA
PER O.P.MEENA, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against order of 1. learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II, Surat(in short “the CIT (A)”) dated 26.12.2014 pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11 which in turn has arisen from the orders passed by the ITO, Ward-4(4), Surat(in short “the AO”) dated 20.03.2013 under section 143(3) of Income Tax Act,1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
The gr
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026