RUTTONSHA INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT 13 (3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to remit the current appeal for AY 2015-16 back to the Assessing Officer. This is because the assessment for AY 2015-16 depends on the outcome of the re-assessment for AY 2014-15.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed brought forward losses for AY 2014-15, which was sustained by the CIT(A). The assessee's appeal for AY 2014-15 was set aside to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment for AY 2015-16 should be decided based on the pending re-assessment for AY 2014-15.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, HONBLE & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HONBLEShri M.P. Ahuja
O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM)
This appeal is filed by the assessee against order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 28.06.2019 for the A.Y. 2015-16.
At the time of hearing, it is brought to our notice that the Assessing Officer has disallowed the brought forward losses for the A.Y. 2014-15 and during this assessment year i.e A.Y. 2015-16, and the same was sustained by Ld.CIT(A). It is brought to our notice that the appeal was (A.Y. 2015-16) Ruttonsha International Rectifier Limited filed by the assessee for the A.Y. 2014-15 and the Coordinate Bench has set aside the order back to the file of the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment afresh. Since the order giving effect order is yet to be passed by the Assessing Officer and now the appeal under consideration A.Y.2015-16 is depends upon the outcome of the re-assessment for the A.Y. 2014-15.
Considering the fact on record we deem it fit and proper to remit this appeal also to the file of the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment based on the re-assessment in A.Y. 2014-15. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment and determine the adjustment of brought forward loss/gain as per law for this assessment year also. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21st June, 2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026