KAMLA ASSOCIATES,SHEOPUR vs. ACIT-3(1), GWALIOR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of advances required fresh verification. It also noted that the nature of payments made to Escorts Limited, which were disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, needed to be determined as either interest or bill discounting charges.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a tractor dealer, received advances in cash from farmers for tractor sales. The Assessing Officer treated these advances totaling Rs. 1,05,65,000 as unexplained cash credits under Section 68. The CIT(A) sustained additions of Rs. 87,58,300 for certain parties.
What were the issues?
Whether cash advances received by a tractor dealer are unexplained cash credits, and the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) to bill discounting charges paid without TDS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “DB”: AGRA
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeal in ITA No.371/AGR/2025 for AY 2011-12, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 24.06.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 29.11.2013 by the Assessing Officer, ACIT, Circle-3, Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The Ground Nos. 3 to 6 raised by the assessee are challenging the confirmation of addition by the Learned CIT(A) of Rs 87,58,300 under section 68 of the Act on account of alleged unexplained cash credits in respect of advances received against sale of tractors.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026