INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI vs. NISHANT AGRAWAL, DHAMTARI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of bogus purchases was made on a protective basis in the hands of the assessee, who was a partner in the firm that allegedly made the purchases. The Tribunal found no justification for taxing these purchases solely in the hands of the assessee on a protective basis, especially when the firm itself was involved and the assessee became its proprietor only after dissolution. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,92,55,750/- by the CIT(A), which was made by the AO on account of bogus purchases. The assessee had filed a cross-objection. The AO had reopened the case on a protective basis, alleging that the assessee, as a proprietor, had taken accommodation entries in the garb of bogus purchases.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition made on account of bogus purchases on a protective basis, and whether the AO properly considered the fact that the assessee was a partner in a firm involved in the alleged transactions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, रायपुर "ायपीठ, रायपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR "ी पाथ" सारथी चौधरी, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी अवधेश कुमार िम", लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No: 717/RPR/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) PAN: AGJPA7658M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri G. S. Agrawal, CA राज" की ओर से / Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 02/04/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of : 09/04/2026 Pronouncement ""ा"ेप सं./CO No: 2/RPR/2026 (Arising out of ITA No.717/RPR/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) PAN: AGJPA7658M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri G. S. Agrawal, CA राज" की ओर से / Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 02/04/2026 घोषण
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026