MANU STOCK BROKING PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee. If the VSVS application does not materialize or is not accepted, the assessee may file an application for the restoration of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) for an assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently opted for settlement of its tax dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024' and filed an application with the authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn given the assessee's election to proceed under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against order passed by CIT(A)-47, Mumbai dated 20/07/2023 for the quantum of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 for the A.Y.2015-16.
M/s. Manu Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd.
In the aforesaid appeal the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that assessee has opted for settlement of its tax dispute under the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024’ and has also filed application before the authorities. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn, however, liberty is given to the assessee in case the application for VSVS does not materialize and is not accepted, assessee may file an application for restoration of the appeal. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 29th January,2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026