BRAHAMPAL SINGH,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD 1(3), GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest received on enhanced compensation for agricultural land is not taxable. Following a Supreme Court decision, it was ruled that such receipts are capital in nature and not income unless specifically brought to tax.
What were the facts?
The assessee received interest on enhanced compensation for acquired agricultural land. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) treated this interest as taxable income from other sources, making an addition to the total income.
What were the issues?
Whether interest received on enhanced compensation for agricultural land is taxable as income from other sources under Section 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘SMC-2’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
PER R.K. PANDA, AM,
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 17.05.2017 of the learned CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon, relating
to AY-2013-14. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 19.10.2013 declaring
total income of Rs.2,62,880/-. During the course of assessment
proceedings vide order sheet entry dated 01.03.2016, the Rs.42,18,086/- being 50% of interest income of Rs.84,36,173/-
received from DRO cum LAC, Gurgaon, may not be brought into tax, keeping in view the amended provisions of Income Tax Act as clause (viii) in sub-section 2 of section 56 introduced by Finance
Act, 2009 effective from the assessment year 2010-11, after
al
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 56(2)(viii)
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sudhakar Purushottam Bhalerao, Osmanabad vs ITO Ward 1, LaturITA 2882/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Randhir Singh, Yamunanagar vs ITO, YamunanagarITA 661/CHANDI/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rakesh, Gurgaon vs Income Tax Officer, GurugramITA 5707/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026