MRS RAKHEE R SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASST. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-22(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1022/MUM/2022Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 June 2022AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the National Faceless Assessment Centre proceeded to dismiss the appeal despite being informed of the withdrawal from the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. This was considered an inadvertent mistake.

What were the facts?

The assessee had withdrawn an application under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. However, the National Faceless Assessment Centre dismissed the appeal, stating the matter was settled under the scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal was correctly dismissed as settled under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme when the assessee had withdrawn from it.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI B BENCH, MUMBAI

Per Pramod Kumar VP 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the order dated 15.03.2022 passed by the learned National Faceless Assessment Centre in the matter of assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961, for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. Grievances raised by the assessee is as follows:- The Appellant contends that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed her appeal inasmuch as she e-filed a letter on 29th September 2021 with the CIT(A) informing him that the appellant has withdrawn the application made under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. 3. Having heard the learned Departmental Representative and having perused the material on record, we find that the assessee had informed the learned National Faceless Assessment Centre, that the assessee has withdrawn an application under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme and yet learned National Faceless Assessment Centre proceeded to dismiss the appeal on the ground ITA No.: 1022/Mum/2022 Assessment year: 2013-14 Page 2 of 2 that the matter has been settled under Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. As the matter of fact in paragraph 3 of the impugned order, learned National Faceless Assessment Centre has categorically taking note of the said plea of the assessee yet, apparently on account of inadvertent mistake proceeded dispose of the matter as if the matter is settled under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. In view of these discussions as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to remit the matter to the file of the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits. Ordered, accordingly.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →