MRS RAKHEE R SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASST. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-22(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the National Faceless Assessment Centre proceeded to dismiss the appeal despite being informed of the withdrawal from the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. This was considered an inadvertent mistake.
What were the facts?
The assessee had withdrawn an application under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. However, the National Faceless Assessment Centre dismissed the appeal, stating the matter was settled under the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal was correctly dismissed as settled under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme when the assessee had withdrawn from it.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI B BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Pramod Kumar VP 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the order dated 15.03.2022 passed by the learned National Faceless Assessment Centre in the matter of assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961, for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. Grievances raised by the assessee is as follows:- The Appellant contends that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed her appeal inasmuch as she e-filed a letter on 29th September 2021 with the CIT(A) informing him that the appellant has withdrawn the application made under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. 3. Having heard the learned Departmental Representative and having perused the material on record, we find that the assessee had informed the learned National Faceless Assessment Centre, that the assessee has withdrawn an application under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme and yet learned National Faceless Assessment Centre proceeded to dismiss the appeal on the ground ITA No.: 1022/Mum/2022 Assessment year: 2013-14 Page 2 of 2 that the matter has been settled under Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. As the matter of fact in paragraph 3 of the impugned order, learned National Faceless Assessment Centre has categorically taking note of the said plea of the assessee yet, apparently on account of inadvertent mistake proceeded dispose of the matter as if the matter is settled under the Vivas Se Vishwas Scheme. In view of these discussions as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to remit the matter to the file of the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits. Ordered, accordingly.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026