DCIT, CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI vs. GANGETIC DEVELOPERS P.LTD, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed two appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeals due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be withdrawn by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
The above two appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order dated 27.09.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT (A)- 4, New Delhi and order dated 30.1.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- 35, New Delhi relating to assessment years 2016-17 & 2015-16.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 19th April, 2021 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him on the ground that he has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and certificate to this effect in Form No. 3 has already been obtained. In respect of the Form No. 3 dated 13.2.2021 issued by Pr. CIT, Delhi-4 shows NIL amount payable by the applicant. In respect of ITA No. 3689/Del/19 also as per Form No. 3 dated 11.2.2021 issued by Pr. CIT Delhi-4, the amount payable by applicant is NIL.
Learned Sr. DR has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeals and the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026