RAM PRAKASH CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw their appeal and dismiss the Revenue's appeal. The Revenue's appeal was considered infructuous in light of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested withdrawal of their appeal and dismissal of the Revenue's appeal for AY 2008-09. This was due to opting for settlement under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020". A certificate under Section 5(1) of the Act was provided.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The primary issue is the procedural consequence of availing the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme on pending appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “F” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI O.P.KANT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM : These appeals by the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2008-09 are directed against the orders of learned CIT(A)-XVIII, New Delhi both dated 28.03.2011.
The assessee, vide his letter dated NIL has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him for Assessment Year 2008-09 and also requested for dismissal of appeal filed by the Revenue for the same Assessment Year i.e. 2008-09 and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrear for the assessment year 2008- 09 under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A 2 certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed in both the appeals for Assessment Year 2008-09.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and dismissal of appeal filed by the Revenue having been infructuous.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 10th June, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026