SAHANA DWELLERS P. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT -3, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the fresh assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer made no additions or variations. Therefore, the appeal challenging the PCIT's order was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The appellant challenged an order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, which had set aside the original assessment order. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed a fresh order under Section 144 read with Section 263 and 144B.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal against the PCIT's order under Section 263 is maintainable when a subsequent assessment order has been passed without any additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, G BENCH, MUMBAI
order : 28.07.2022 O R D E R Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member: 1. By way of the present appeal the Appellant has challenged the order, dated 10.03.2021, passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-3, [hereinafter referred to as ‘the PCIT’] under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) setting aside the Assessment Order, dated 28.12.2017, passed under section 143(3) of the Act.
The Ld. Authorised Representative for the Appellant appearing before us furnished a copy of the assessment order dated 28.03.2022 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 144 read with Section 263 and Section 144B of the Act and submitted that since in the aforesaid order passed in the set aside proceedings no additions/variations have been made, the present appeal may be disposed off.
In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of as being infructuous.
Order pronounced on 28.07.2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026