DCIT, CIRCLE-12(2), NEW DELHI vs. I-PROCESS SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5799/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 July 2021AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the quantum addition on which the penalty was based had been deleted by the ITAT, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) did not survive. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty was upheld.

What were the facts?

The Department appealed the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 65,13,990/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10. The penalty was levied on a quantum addition that was subsequently deleted by the ITAT.

What were the issues?

Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can survive when the underlying quantum addition has been deleted by the appellate tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI

Hearing: 06.07.2021Pronounced: 06.07.2021

ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Department against order dated 03.05.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-39, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2009-10 wherein the Ld. First Appellate Authority has deleted the penalty of Rs.65,13,990/- imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

DCIT vs. I-Process Services India Pvt. Ltd.

2.0 At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submitted that this Tribunal has already deleted the quantum addition made in the captioned assessment year vide order dated 21.04.2017 in and, therefore, the Ld. CIT(A), after duly taking note of the said order of the Tribunal, had rightly deleted the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The Ld. Authorized Representative drew our attention to a copy of the order of the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings to buttress his submission.

3.0 The Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative (DR) fairly accepted that the contention of the Ld. Authorized Representative was correct.

4.0 Having heard both the parties and after having gone through the records as well as the order of the Tribunal in vide order dated 21.04.2017, we agree with the contention of the Ld. Authorized Representative that since the quantum addition has been deleted by this Tribunal, the penalty imposed on such addition does not survive. We also note that the Ld. CIT(A) has, while deleting the impugned penalty, duly noted

DCIT vs. I-Process Services India Pvt. Ltd. that the appeal in the quantum proceedings has been allowed by the ITAT as above. Accordingly, in view of the quantum addition having been deleted by this Tribunal, the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act does not survive. Therefore, we find no reason to interfere with the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) in this regard and we dismiss the grounds raised by the Department.

5.0 In the final result, the appeal of the Department stands dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 6th July, 2021

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →