UPS EXPRESS P LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UPS JETAIR EXPRESS P. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -11(1)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its own prior decision for AY 2013-14, allowing the assessee's claim regarding technical know-how fees and the mark-up on expense recovery. The grounds related to these issues were allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in international transportation, made payments for technical know-how and recovered expenses from its associated enterprise. The Assessing Officer and DRP made transfer pricing adjustments regarding these transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer pricing adjustments made by the revenue authorities regarding technical know-how fees and recovery of expenses were justified. Whether the TPO correctly determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “J” : MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE
PER ANIKESH BANERJEE, J.M.
The instant appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order of the Learned Commissioner
Income Tax (Disputes Resolution Panel)-2 [In short “Ld. CIT”
& “DRP”] bearing Din & Order No.ITBA/DRP/F/144C(5)/
2020-21/1031567827(1) vide order dated 17.03.2021
2 ITA.No.1221/Mum./2021 UPS Express Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai.
passed under section 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
[In short “Act”] and arises out of the draft assessment order
passed by the Learned ACIT, Circle-11(10(2)], Mumbai [in short “A.O.”], vide order dated 13.12.2019 passed under section 143(3)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(5)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026