VINOD KOHLI,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-38(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present their case. The CIT(A) was directed to decide the issue based on facts and law after the assessee's appearance.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return of income, and the case was reopened under Section 147 based on information about property holdings. The Assessing Officer made additions to the total income. The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A), leading to an ex parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and whether the additions made by the AO were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC-1 : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 28th June, 2019 of the CIT(A)-13, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2011-12.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issue of notice by the Registry. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.
Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, these all relate to the ex parte order of the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the AO as well as upholding the validity of reassessment.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and had filed his return of income on 22nd October, 2018 declaring the total income at Rs.8,36,731/-. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 on the basis of information received from the office of the Director of Income-tax (Inv.) that the assessee is holding various movable and immovable properties. In response to the notice issued u/s 148 and subsequent statutory notices issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1) the assessee filed certain details. The AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.11,69,930/- wherein he made addition of Rs.3,33,200/- on account of notional rent on house property. Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A), the ld. CIT(A), in the ex parte order passed by her, upheld the various additions made by the AO.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard the ld. DR and perused the record. It is an admitted fact that the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite number of opportunities granted by the office of the ld.CIT(A) for which the ld.CIT(A) was constrained to pass the ex parte order dismissing the appeal of the assessee. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) and 2 substantiate his case, failing which, the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. I hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026