SARASWATIVIDYA GURUKULUM FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the ld. CIT(E) had rejected the applications solely on grounds of alleged non-compliance without addressing the merits. It was noted that the assessee had indeed complied with the show cause notice. Therefore, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to the ld. CIT(E), directing them to grant the assessee a fresh opportunity to submit all supporting documents and to decide the applications for Section 12AB registration and Section 80G approval on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Section 8 company engaged in charitable activities, applied for registration under Section 12AB and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, subsequent to provisional registration under Section 12A. The ld. CIT(E) rejected both applications, citing the assessee's non-compliance with a show cause notice requesting details on foreign expenditure, activities, and expenses, despite the assessee claiming to have submitted the required information via email.
What were the issues?
Whether the ld. CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the applications for Section 12AB registration and Section 80G approval solely on grounds of alleged non-compliance, without considering the applications on their merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: AND SHRI. GIRISH AGARWAL, AM
Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: These captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai (‘ld. CIT(A)’ for short), order dated 25.10.2024, for rejecting the application filed by the assessee u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act') and Section 80G registration for A.Y. 2023-24. 2. As the facts are identical, we hereby pass a consolidated order by taking ITA No. 6035/Mum/2024 as a lead case. ITA No. 6035/Mum/2024; (A.Y.: 2023-24)
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
ITA No. 6035 & 6036 (A.Y. 2023-24) Saraswatividya Gurukulam Foundation “L
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026