ALIASAGAR YUSUF MOTORWALA ,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD, 22(1)(6), MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEEAliasgar Yusuf Motorwala 73 75 Jaiwala Building, S V P. Road, Null Bazar, Mumbai-400 003 PAN:AJXPM8409R vs ITO, Ward 22(1)(6), Mumbai Piramal Chamber, Mumbai-400 012 APPELLANT
PER ANIKESH BANERJEE:
Instant appeal of the assessee was filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi *for brevity, ‘Ld.CIT(A)’) passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act’), date of order 10/12/2024 for A.Y. 2013-14. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi, passed under section 147
read with section 144, read with section 144B of the Act, date of order
16/03/2022. 2
Aliasgar Yusuf Motorwala
The assessee, vide its letter dated January 20,2025, filed in this office on 21/01/2025, sought to withdraw the appeal on account of the following reasons: - “I would like to inform that I have filed application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas (DTVSV) 2024 scheme. As per Form 2 issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), proof of withdrawal of the appeal is requisite for submission to be enclosed with Form 3 under the said scheme.”
The Ld. DR did not raise any objection in allowing the assessee to withdraw the appeal for the reasons stated above. In the circumstances, in view of the agreed proposition, we dismiss the appeal, as withdrawn. 4. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee bearing ITA No.6699/Mum/2024 is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th day of February 2025. (B.R. BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai,दिन ांक/Dated: 10/02/2025 Pavanan
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
अपील र्थी/The Appellant , 2. प्रदिव िी/ The Respondent. 3. आयकरआयुक्त CIT 4. दवभ गीयप्रदिदनदि, आय.अपी.अदि., मुबांई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. ग र्डफ इल/Guard file.
BY ORDER,
////
(Asstt.