PRAGYA MUDGAL,NOIDA vs. ITO WARD - 2(4), NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, citing the principles of natural justice. The assessee was directed not to seek adjournments unless absolutely necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was re-opened under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, and an ex-parte assessment order was passed. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-payment of the requisite fee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-payment of fees without providing a reasonable opportunity for hearing and whether the principles of natural justice were violated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 249(1)(a),Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “SMC-1” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM :
This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Noida dated 28.09.2018. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-
"That the Order is Void, Illegal, Arbitrary and against the Principles of Natural Justice.
That no reasonable opportunity has been provided before deciding the case.
That the Notice dated 10109/2018 was issued to the Appellant. However, the request for adjournment of the case was not accepted.
That if the Appellant has not received or has not been served, the Tribunal may restore the matter and at least a chance of hearing should be provided as held in case of Meghji Kanji Patel Vis Kundanmal Chama
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026