ASHA RANI GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-7(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present her case. The assessee is directed to appear without seeking adjournments.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return of income which was significantly enhanced by the AO due to unexplained cash credit, bogus capital gains, and commission paid. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex parte for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to appear.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and whether the assessee should be given a final chance to present her case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC-2 : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Asha Rani Gupta, Vs ITO, 9/9, South Patel Nagar, Ward-7(2), New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: AHXPG4460G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Vijay Kumar Kataria, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 28.07.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 02.09.2019 of the CIT(A)-3, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2011-12.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issue of notice through RPAD. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of the material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.
Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, these all relate to the ex parte order of the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the AO and determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- as against the returned income of Rs.1,88,500/-.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed her return of income on 13.01.2012 declaring the income at Rs.1,88,500/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s 144/147 of the Act on 17th December, 2018 determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- wherein he made an addition of Rs.12,86,120/- on account of unexplained cash credit and bogus capital gains and Rs.25,722/- on account of commission paid for arranging accommodation entry. Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite three opportunities granted by sending notice through e-mail, the ld.CIT(A), in the ex parte order passed by him, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee for non- prosecution.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard the ld. DR and perused the orders of the AO and the CIT(A). It is an admitted fact that due to non-submission of requisite details, the AO passed the order u/s 144/147 of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- as against the returned income at Rs.1,88,500/-. Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite three notices sent by e-mail, the ld.CIT(A) in the ex parte order passed by him, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of 2 justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) and explain her case without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. I hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026