ASHA RANI GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-7(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8784/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 July 2021AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present her case. The assessee is directed to appear without seeking adjournments.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income which was significantly enhanced by the AO due to unexplained cash credit, bogus capital gains, and commission paid. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex parte for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to appear.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and whether the assessee should be given a final chance to present her case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC-2 : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA

For Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Kataria, Sr. DR
Hearing: 28.07.2021Pronounced: 28.07.2021

BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Asha Rani Gupta, Vs ITO, 9/9, South Patel Nagar, Ward-7(2), New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: AHXPG4460G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Vijay Kumar Kataria, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 28.07.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 02.09.2019 of the CIT(A)-3, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2011-12.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issue of notice through RPAD. Therefore, this appeal is being decided on the basis of the material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.

3.

Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, these all relate to the ex parte order of the CIT(A) in confirming the various additions made by the AO and determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- as against the returned income of Rs.1,88,500/-.

4.

Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed her return of income on 13.01.2012 declaring the income at Rs.1,88,500/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s 144/147 of the Act on 17th December, 2018 determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- wherein he made an addition of Rs.12,86,120/- on account of unexplained cash credit and bogus capital gains and Rs.25,722/- on account of commission paid for arranging accommodation entry. Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite three opportunities granted by sending notice through e-mail, the ld.CIT(A), in the ex parte order passed by him, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee for non- prosecution.

5.

Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

6.

I have heard the ld. DR and perused the orders of the AO and the CIT(A). It is an admitted fact that due to non-submission of requisite details, the AO passed the order u/s 144/147 of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.15,00,342/- as against the returned income at Rs.1,88,500/-. Since the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite three notices sent by e-mail, the ld.CIT(A) in the ex parte order passed by him, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of 2 justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) and explain her case without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. I hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →