BHUSHAN STEEL LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the quantum additions, which formed the basis for the penalties, had been deleted by a coordinate bench, the penalties must also be deleted. The AO was directed to delete the penalties levied.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11. The penalties were levied based on quantum additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying additions have been deleted by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA & SH. K.NARASIMHA CHARY
4649/Del/2018 the captioned two appeals are by the assessee preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-23, New Delhi dated 29.12.2017 pertaining to A.Y. 2009- 10 and 2010-11.
Since common grievance is involved in both these appeals they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
The common grievance in both these appeals relate to the levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act amounting to Rs.84,24,32,000/- in A.Y.2009-10 and Rs.23,96,46,000/- in A.Y.2010-11.
At the very outset, the counsel for the assessee pointed out that the quantum additions on the basis of which the impugned penalties have been levied in the captioned assessment years have been deleted by the Tribunal.
Per contra the DR fairly conceded to this.
We have carefully considered the orders of the authorities below and the decision of this Tribunal in and 1491/Del/2018 for A.Y.2009-10 and 1601/Del/2018 and 1492/Del/2018 for A.Y.2010-11.
We find force in the contention of the counsel the coordinate Bench in its judgment (supra) has deleted the quantum additions.
The relevant findings of the Tribunal read as under :-
Since the foundation has been removed the superstructure must fall. The AO is directed to delete the penalty so levied in both the assessment years under consideration.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed.
Decision announced in the open court in the presence of both the representatives on 28.07.2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026