NOMURA SERVICES INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 10(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal agreed that the mentioned paragraph was not warranted as it did not pertain to the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the irrelevant paragraph from the original order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Nomura Services India Pvt. Ltd., sought a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order. The assessee pointed out that a specific paragraph in the order was irrelevant to their case and pertained to a group company.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the inclusion of irrelevant information in a previous tribunal order that needed correction.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
We find that appeal in the case of Nomura Services India Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Lehman Brothers Services India Pvt. Ltd.,) for A.Y.2009-10 in 15/07/2022. While disposing of the said order, this Tribunal in para 2 had stated as under:-
“2. At the outset both the parties stated that though appeal for A.Y.2008-09 is pending disposal before this Tribunal, this Tribunal need not await disposal of appeal of A.Y.2008-09 as the outcome of the said appeal would not have any bearing on appeal for A.Y.2009-10.”
The assessee vide letter dated 26/07/2022 had brought to our notice that the aforesaid para 2 mentioned in the Tribunal order is of no relevance as far as the present assessee is concerned. For the sake of convenience, letter dated 26/07/2022 of the assessee is reproduced hereunder:-
Nomura Services India Pvt. Ltd., 3.1. On perusal of the aforesaid letter we find that this para No.2 in Tribunal order is not warranted as it does not pertain to the assessee i.e. Nomura Services India Pvt. Ltd., and the same pertains only to Nomura
Nomura Services India Pvt. Ltd., Fin Services India Pvt. Ltd., (group company of the assessee), hence, we deem it fit to issue this corrigendum by stating as under:-
“Para 2 of the order in A.Y.2009-10 dated 15/07/2022 shall stand deleted”
3.2. Para 2.1 of the said order shall have to be read as para 2. This corrigendum is to be read as part and parcel of the original Tribunal order dated 15/07/2022. Ordered accordingly.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026