ICICI BANK LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DY.COMM.OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submission that the CIT(A) incorrectly dismissed the appeal without adjudicating on merits. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the issues were restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) based on the belief that the issue was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. However, the assessee clarified that the scheme application was for a merged entity and not related to the impugned assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal without considering the merits, based on a mistaken assumption about the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme settlement.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Mumbai
O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (AM) :-
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 26.8.2021 passed by learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi and it relates to A.Y. 2000-01.
The Learned AR submitted that the learned CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee stating that the assessee has settled the issue under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. The Learned AR submitted that the assessee has not filed application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Act for the impugned assessment order/ order passed by the learned CIT(A). The Learned AR submitted that the assessee had filed an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Act in respect of its merged entity named Bank of Madura Limited and the said application has nothing to do with the impugned assessment order/order passed by the learned CIT(A). Accordingly, the learned AR submitted that the order passed by Learned CIT(A) dismissing the appeal of the assessee is not correct and he should have adjudicated the issues urged in 2 ICICI Bank Limited that appeal on merits. Accordingly, the Learned A.R prayed that the impugned order passed by learned CIT(A) be set aside and he may be directed to adjudicate all the grounds of merit.
The Learned DR did not controvert the factual aspects presented by learned AR.
Having heard the rival submissions, we are of the view that there is merit in the submissions made by the learned AR. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by learned CIT(A) and restore all the issues to his file with the direction to adjudicate all grounds on merit, after affording adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23.08.2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026