ACIT, 14(1)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. FORTRAN STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT () & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL () Assessment Year: 2011-12
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against order dated 05.01.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2011-12 in relation to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
At the outset, th assessee has opted therefore, assessee s counsel also filed a c prescribed authority the assessee for with as infructuous with appeal in case the Vishwas Scheme’ fina 3. In the result, withdrawn. Order pronoun (KAVITHA RA JUDICIAL M Mumbai; Dated: 13/02/2025 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.
Copy of the Order forward
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent.
3. CIT
4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai
5. Guard file.
////
IT he Ld. counsel for the assessee for ‘Vivad Se Vishwas’ Sche seeks to withdraw the present copy of the relevant Form subm which is placed on record. In vi hdrawal of the appeal, the appe liberty to file an application f application of the assessee u ally not accepted.
the appeal of the Revenue i ced in the open Court on 13/0
-
S
AJAGOPAL)
(OM PRAK
MEMBER
ACCOUNTA ded to :
BY ORDER
(Assistant Re
ITAT, Mu
Fortran Steel Pvt. Ltd.
2
TA No. 994/MUM/2024
e submitted that eme, 2024 and appeal. The Ld.
mitted before the iew of request of eal is dismissed for recalling the under ‘Vivad Se s dismissed as 02/2025. KASH KANT)
ANT MEMBER
R, gistrar) umbai