Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, AM & SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM
O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter “AO”) dated 14.12.2016 passed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Panel-1, Mumbai (DRP) directions u/s 144C(5) dated 24.11.2016.
At the outset, it has been brought to our notice that assessee have filed an application for withdrawal of appeal by letter dated 18.06.2022 wherein it has pointed out that it had applied for the Vivad Se Vishwaas Act 2020 (hereinafter “the scheme”) by filing Form No- 1 & 2; and pursuant thereto the assessee received certificate in Form no- 3 from the Ld. PCIT-17; and the assessee in turn filed Form no- 4 (expressing its intention to withdraw this appeal) and resultantly had received Form no- 5 (i.e. Full and Final settlement order dated
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 17.10.2021). In the light of the above development, since we find that the assessee have received the Form no- 5 as per the Vivad Se Vishwaas Act 2020, the assessee’s application for withdrawal of appeal for AY. 2012-13 is allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on this 02/09/2022.