JEEVANTI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED,THANE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), THANE

Having heard t careful perusal of th Ld. CIT(A) has dismi non-compliance. Befo has submitted that t hearing but was su system. It has been c three years, no noti assessee regularly c notice was suddenly 2024, which, howev authorized in this reg to the assessee, the 30.10.2024. 2.1 In our consider present case indica compliance with the noted that the order the assessee’s subm appropriate to reman for fresh adjudica submissions made opportunity to prese Jeeva ITA he rival submissions of the pa he material placed on record, w issed the appeal of the assessee ore this Court, learned counsel the appeal was initially schedu bsequently transferred to the contended that for a prolonged ices were issued to the assess checking the Income-tax porta issued by the Faceless Appeal ver, remained unnoticed by th gard. Without affording any furt e Ld. CIT(A) proceeded to pas ed opinion, the facts and circum ate sufficient cause for the a notices issued by the Ld. CIT( has been passed without due c missions. In the interest of just nd the matter back to the file o ation, ensuring due conside by the assessee and affordin ent its case. The matter shall anti Healthcare Pvt. Ltd 2 A No. 6936/MUM/2024 arties and upon we find that the e on grounds of for the assessee uled for physical faceless appeal period of two to see, despite the al. Thereafter, a l Centre in July he persons duly ther opportunity ss an order on mstances of the assessee’s non- (A). It is further consideration of tice, we deem it of the Ld. CIT(A) eration of the ng a reasonable l be decided in accordance with the accordingly allowed. 3. In the result, statistical purposes. Order pronoun (KAVITHA RA JUDICIAL M Mumbai; Dated: 14/02/2025 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.