AVEVA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (SUCCESSOR OF AVEVA SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 15(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with liberty to reinstate it if the Vivad Se Vishwas application is not accepted. The dismissal was based on the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the final assessment order for AY 2020-21. During the hearing, the assessee's AR submitted a copy of the acknowledgement for filing under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, with a condition for potential reinstatement.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “K” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JM & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, AM
O R D E R
Per Sandeep Singh Karhail, JM :
The assessee has filed the present appeal challenging the impugned final assessment order dated 30.07.2024, passed under section 143(3) r.w. section 144C(13) r.w. section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) pursuant to the directions issued by the learned Dispute Resolution Panel-1, Mumbai-2, for the assessment year 2020-21.
At the time of the hearing, the learned AR for the assessee submitted a copy of the acknowledgement dated 31.01.2025 of filing of Form 1 under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and stated that 2 Aveva Information Technology India Pvt. Ltd. the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.In light of the above letter, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with the liberty to reinstate the appeal if its application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, is not accepted.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026