MANN RESIDENCY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-16(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5961/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 August 2021AY 2015-162 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The tribunal granted permission for withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under a tax amnesty scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI O.P. KANT & SHRI AMARJEET SINGH

Hearing: 23.08.2021Pronounced: 23.08.2021

ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Delhi, dated 26.06.2018 passed for assessment year 2015-16. 2. We have heard learned Representatives of both the parties through Video Conferencing. 3. The learned counsel for the assessee filed a letter through email, dated 18th August, 2021, wherein he has requested for withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration, under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. The Form No. 3 has been issued in favour of the assessee, which is placed on record. The learned counsel, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →