JAY USHIN LTD,NEW DELHI vs. PRCIT, CENTRAL-2, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders passed by the Principal CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for AYs 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee later filed an application seeking withdrawal of these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeals against the revisionary orders under Section 263 should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
PER R.K. PANDA, AM:
The above 02 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 30.03.2018 passed u/s. 263 of the I.T. Act, 1961 of the Ld. Pr. CIT, Central-2, New Delhi for the assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11. & 3894/DEL/2018 AYRS. 2009-10 & 2010-11
At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed an Application seeking withdrawal of appeals. The contents of the Assessee’s A.R. Application dated 24.8.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeals are reproduced as under:-
Date: 24th August, 2021 Before, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘C’ New Delhi In the matter of : M/s Jay Ushin Ltd. and 3894/Del/2018 AY: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Hon’ble Sir(s),
That the captioned appeals filed by the assessee are fixed for hearing on 24.08.2021.
It is respectfully submitted that the captioned appeals are with respect to order so passed by learned PCIT under section 263 of the Act, whereas, in assessment orders passed in pursuance to the aforesaid order i.e. under section 143(3) read with section 263 of the Act, the assessee has got substantial relief. As such, the assessee intends to withdraw the captioned matters. It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that the captioned matters may be permitted to be withdrawn by the assessee.
It is prayed accordingly.
Sd/- (Shailesh Gupta) Counsel for Assessee”
Learned Senior DR has no objection on the request of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee for withdrawal of assessee’s appeals. & 3894/DEL/2018 AYRS. 2009-10 & 2010-11
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee’s counsel for withdrawal of the aforesaid appeals.
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24.08.2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026