ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SAMTEL COLOR LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to the company undergoing insolvency resolution proceedings. The appeal was dismissed with liberty to the Revenue to refile it after bringing the official liquidator on record or if the company successfully exited the process.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which had deleted several disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee company was undergoing insolvency proceedings and had remained unrepresented for multiple hearings.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal against a company undergoing insolvency proceedings. The Tribunal also considered the deletion of various disallowances by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
This appeal is filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 22(1), New Delhi (the learned AO) in 2000-11, against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 8, New Delhi dated 10/12/2014; wherein, the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the learned Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on 27/02/2013, determining total income of the assessee at Rs Nil against the returned income of the assessee filed on 24/9/2010 at Rs. Nil, was partly allowed.
The learned Assessing Officer is aggrieved with the order of the learned CIT(A) wherein he a. deleted the disallowance of depreciation of ₹ 96,97,893/–, b. deleted the disallowance of ₹ 9,46,000/- on account of disallowance of bad debts, c. deleted the disallowance of ₹ 48,258,956 u/s 43B of the act, Page | 1
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026