ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MORADABAD vs. GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for dismissal of the Revenue's appeals. The appeals were dismissed as they had become infructuous due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The assessee requested dismissal of these appeals as they had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeals should be dismissed as infructuous due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :
These two appeals by the revenue for the assessment years 2011-12 & 2012-13 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-1, Jodhpur dated 23.05.2018 & 18.07.2018 respectively.
2 ITA- 6842/Del/2018 ITA – 263/Del/2019 2. None appeared on behalf of the aassessee at the time of virtual hearing.
The learned A.R. for the assessee, vide his letter dated 30.04.2021, has requested for dismissal of the appeals filed by the Revenue and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in both the Assessment Years has also been filed showing amount payable NIL issued by the PCIT (Central), Lucknow on 28/04/2021.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for dismissal of the appeals of the Revenue.
In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed having become infructuous.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 31st August, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026