ITO, WARD-8(2), NEW DELHI vs. EMPEROR INFRATECH P. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and filed the necessary declarations.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (Assessment Year : 2010-11) ITO Vs. Emperor Infratech P. Ltd. Ward – 8(2), E-18, 2nd Floor, New Delhi Model Town-II, New Delhi-110009 PAN : AABCE 2810 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Divyansh Jain, Adv. Revenue by Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing: 01.09.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 01.09.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM:
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 27.08.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2010-11.
Before us, assessee has moved an application dated 10th April 2021 wherein the assessee has stated that it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form- 1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and department had issued
2 Form-3. The assessee, therefore, seeks to withdraw the appeal to which Revenue has no objection.
After considering the request made by the assessee, we dismiss the appeal of Revenue as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. With these directions the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 4.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026