DEEPAK JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-25(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS), and the Revenue had accepted Form-1 and Form-2. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a salaried employee and director, filed an appeal against additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The additions pertained to unexplained cash credit and commission expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, New Delhi, [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 12.10.2018 for Assessment Year 2015-16. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:
“1. The appellant is the salaried employee (Director of Tejas Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.), who filed his Income tax return of AY 2015-16 on 19.08.2015 declaring taxable income of Rs. 30,02,970/- consisting Income under head Salary, Income from Business and Profession, Income from capital gain and Income Page 1 of 4
ITA No.- 8144/Del/2018 Deepak Jain from Other Sources. 2. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS later notice u/s 143(2) was issued which was duly complied from time to time. 3. The case of the assesse company was assessed by the Id. AO by passing assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 22.12.2017 and make additions on the following grounds: a. Long term Capital Gain as Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act of Rs. 19,92,060/- b. Unexplained commission expenses of Rs. 39,842/- calculated on adhoc basis paid to entry operator.
4. The return of the appellant was assessed u/s 143(3) and demand of Rs. 8,87,890/- was raised.
5. Also the Id. AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(l)(c).
6. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT (Appeals) and Ld. AO this appeal has been preferred to get justice.”
(B) At the time of hearing, we took notice of letter dated 04/09/2021 filed by assessee.
In this letter it has been intimated from the assessee’s side that the assessee had filed Form -1 and Form-2 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) has been accepted by Revenue; and further, that Form 3 dated 11/12/2020 has issued by designated authority under VSVS has been received by the assessee. We have also perused copies of Form-3 and Form-4 under aforesaid VSVS, copies whereof were filed by the assessee alongwith the aforesaid letter dated 04/09/2021. In view of this, the learned Senior Departmental Representative (“Ld. Sr. DR”, for short) submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, and in view of the foregoing; we treat this appeal as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if the disputes under this appeal are not fully settled under VSVS, then the ITA No.- 8144/Del/2018 Deepak Jain assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal in accordance with law.
(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.
This order was already pronounced on 15th September, 2021 in Open Court, in the absence of any representative from assessee’s side, but in the presence of Ld. Sr. DR; after conclusion of the hearing. Now, this written order is signed today on 16/09/2021.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- Korba Steel Castings vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 29 Oct 2026