SH. RAMESH CHAND,ROORKEE vs. ACIT, HARIDWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2014/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 September 2021AY 2007-083 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the land retained its character as agricultural land despite the area being notified as an industrial estate. The notification did not alter the land's character, and it was never converted to non-agricultural use through proper procedures. Therefore, the sale proceeds were not liable to tax.

What were the facts?

The assessee sold two parcels of agricultural land, making substantial profits. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated these profits as business income, considering the acquisition and sale as a business venture. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition, viewing the transactions as an adventure in the nature of trade.

What were the issues?

Whether the profit arising from the sale of agricultural land, even with substantial profit margins, is to be treated as business income or capital gains. Whether the notification of an area as an industrial estate automatically changes the character of agricultural land for tax purposes.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH, DEHRADUN

Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar

Hearing: 17.09.2021Pronounced: 22.09.2021

Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Dehradun dated 27.01.2016.

2.

Based on the enquiries made by the Assistant Direct(Inv.), Unit-II, Dehradun that the assessee has earned profit of Rs.71,09,960/- out of sale proceeds of land and that the assessee has not filed return of income for the A.Y. 2007-08, a notice u/s 148 has been issued by the ITO, Ward- 2, Roorkee.

3.

The only issue is with regard to addition of Rs.71,09,960/- arising out of profit earned by the assessee for sale of two parcels of agricultural land situated at Bhagwanpur District, Roorkee. The AO has made addition on the ground that income resulting from sale of agricultural land is to be charged as income from business which was subsequently confirmed by 2 Ramesh Chand the ld. CIT (A) though he held that such land were agricultural land. The relevant facts culled for the adjudication of the issue are that the assessee has purchased 5830 sq. mtr. of land on 25.02.2005 situated at village Lakheswari, Bhagwanpur, Roorkee and sold the same on 04.07.2006. Another parcel of land was purchased on 16.02.2006 and sold on 13.04.2006. No doubt, the assessee made profit @ 1500% to 3800% on these transactions. The AO held that such acquisition and sale of land can be described as a business venture and hence treated the profit as business income. The AO has also held that the land sold was not agricultural land but industrial land at the time of sale.

4.

The ld. CIT (A) confirmed the addition made on the grounds that though the asset is an agricultural land since it is purchased with a view of selling it to make huge profit then such profits from the sale of land can be brought to tax as business income as the same could be an adventure in the nature of trade.

5.

Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record.

6.

We find from the record that the land continued to be used for agricultural during the period of position by the assessee. The area has been notified as industrial estate by Department of Industrial Development, Government of Uttarakhand vide order dated 15.12.2005. The notification would not alter the character of the land and doesn’t immediately renders it into a capital asset. The land was never converted into non-agricultural by resorting to specific provisions of conversion of land used by the appropriate authorities. The asset has not lost its character of being an agricultural land at the time of purchase as well as at the time of sale. The only reason revenue brought the transaction for taxation is that the assessee has earned huge profits as spelled out in the 3 Ramesh Chand order of ld. CIT (A) disregarding the evidence decipherable from the revenue records filed before them.

7.

Hence, taking into entire facts of the case into consideration, we hereby hold that the sale proceeds of the said asset is not liable to tax.

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 22/09/2021.

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →