PASHUPATI TEXTILES & PRINTS PVT. LTD.,MEERUT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, MEERUT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that both the assessee and the revenue agreed that the appeal had become infructuous due to the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Therefore, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. During the hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal about their application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and the issuance of Form-3.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal had become infructuous due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), New Delhi, dated 29.06.2018 for Assessment Year 2006-07. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:
“1. The learned CIT(Appeal) was not justified by dismissing the appeal. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in summarily rejecting the plea of the appellant Company wrt making disallowance of expenses incurred under the head Printing Job Work under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to non-complying TDS provisions while the assessment was made under section 143(3) and payees are assessed to income tax.
ITA No.-5569/Del/2018. Pashupati Textiles & Prints Pvt. Ltd. 3. The assessee craves leave to add / alter any of the grounds of appeal before or at the time hearing.”
(B) At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee informed us that the assessee has filed application for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that Form-3 has already been issued. He drew our attention to letter filed from assessee’s side in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) giving intimation of the same. In view of this, the learned Counsel as well as the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative) [“Ld. CIT(DR), for short] submitted before us that this appeal may be considered as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. We have also perused Copy of Form -3 dated 24/12/2020 issued by the Designated Authority under VSVS; which was also filed from the assessee’s side alongwith above mentioned letter. After due consideration, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become infructuous on account of aforesaid VSVS and this appeal is treated as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. In view of the foregoing, and as both sides are in agreement to this, this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.
(B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal, in accordance with law.
(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.
ITA No.-5569/Del/2018. Pashupati Textiles & Prints Pvt. Ltd. This order was orally pronounced on 23rd September, 2021 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 23/09/2021 .
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026