BEAM GLOBAL SPIRITS & WINE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once a settlement certificate under the Vivad se Vishwas Act was issued, the Assessing Officer should not have proceeded with the final assessment. The final assessment order was quashed as it contravened the provisions of the VSV Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to settle disputed tax demand under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. Despite obtaining a settlement certificate (Form 5) under the Act, the Assessing Officer proceeded to pass a final assessment order and raised a demand. The assessee had also withdrawn its objections before the DRP based on the VSV settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether a final assessment order can be passed after a taxpayer has settled the disputed tax demand under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. Whether the Assessing Officer erred in ignoring the settlement under the VSV Act and issuing a demand notice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 156,Section 4,Section 5(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘I-1’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SHRI LALIET KUMAR
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against order dated
2011 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) r.ws. 143(3A) and 143(3B)
of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'The Act'].
The grievances of the assessee read as under:
“On the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the final assessment order passed by the Learned Assessing Officer (‘Ld. AO’) is bad in law and is void ab-initio.
On the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the Ld. Assessing Officer while issuing the notice of demand under s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026